Without it, they are dashing hopes universal scope and cost management, the whole package good the collapse. From a legal duty RIP devastating consequences did the White House Tuesday.
Everyone agrees. Held unconstitutional by individual duty decision Monday checking possible alternatives in the wake of some lawmakers and some consumer advocates.
Nebraska the health bill vote Democrat Senator Ben Nelson, reluctantly, he said "not big fan I individual duty".
It is said that the research arm of Congress wanted to be an effective way extends the coverage to uninsured Nelson Government Accountability Office, possible alternatives to identify his analysis.
Jamie Court, President of consumer watchdog, freedom advocates a series of "the health insurance purchasing delegate that does not require health care reform" and described. Indeed, said Mr. Court millions of new customers can recharge it with no guarantee how long the firm Cap is "health insurance companies to candidates" was.
Instead of one individual duty makes people to buy insurance financial incentives. For example, health policy experts insurance company will soon to can increase the insurance premiums for people to delay registration, and can provide a discount to people to sign up. Medicare such registered late penalties, and cover some people physician services B, and cover prescription drugs imposes D signing.
To consumers, so seeing the they care if you can sign another approach's insurance year, limit the registration to one or two month no sho-.
Obama Mr. King he describes as a progressive law: low-and moderate-insurance; Buy person income in order to provide the coverage applies to all grants users requirements for insurance companies; prohibits charging higher insurance premiums or people who have been ill.
No individual cover may require caution that the insurance company requirements, Obama said the consumer insurance none goes up. Trust than average and higher insurance premiums according to this logic less healthy people not to buy insurance, and to purchase it becomes — employers, employees and their own insurance to buy consumer.
Set the argument in the detailed survey is included in the Congress regulations new law. To keep the law in the Court of Justice Ministry again quote those results. Law "does not provide coverage of the smallest effective feature was the" Monday to judge Henry E. Hudson if the decision of the Federal District Court in Richmond, Virginia, Department said,
Justice Ministry on Tuesday, the ruling United States appeals will sue 4, Circuit Court of Richmond, he said.
Tracy Schmaler, DOJ spokesman, "sector believe that you should follow the normal course can listen first before deciding whether or not to consider the Court of appeal in this case Supreme Court can develop arguments full issues and so the", she said. And I Schmaler pointed out that appeals court "than" provision 2014 until enough time than by judge Hudson falls enabled, the case does not consider.
Hear the case raises, Brian j. Gottstein, Virginia Attorney General, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, litigation, spokesman for II is applying for a Supreme Court, whether determined said there was no.
In the past, several prominent Republicans support as a substitute for the requirements to provide coverage of the employer as a way to foster individual duty personal responsibility. In 1993, the main Senate Republican party alternative presidential Bill Clinton health plans and rigidity of financial penalties includes individual duty by adoption this year of the law.
Mitt Romney also the duty of the individual at the heart of health plan in 2006 was in Massachusetts Governor assistance was adopted. "We are the ultimate maintenance plans" Romney said this year said.
In a letter to Congressional leaders last year, another Republican party Governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger California said, of combined issuance of guarantees, insurance is individual duty enforceable, the best way to achieve coverage at all.
Republican view Capitol Hill, tea party movement in the strengthening of many different. Now many Republicans, condemn the duty of the individual federal infringement intended a freedom of the individual. They are much more comprehensive and is more costly than what you're doing right now, need to buy insurance.
At the same time in the campaign this year, House Republicans said, all of the health care regardless of existing conditions, "or" may have access to past illness manifesto the. They are ways to achieve their goals without individual missions is off completely.
In the manifest, "A pledge to America," said House Republican will enlarge for people who cannot obtain the existing criteria for high risk pools, coverage. It is recommended that pay the request exceeds a threshold number of large share under they also state, reinsurance programs.
Reduce the insurance premium, if similar proposal was provided by House Republicans last year cover uninsured only 3000000 people may be said Budget Bureau — earn approximately one tenth of the number of expected coverage Obama President's health care overhaul.
Democrats, they propose almost is says does not. Theda R-Skocpol, Government, and social sciences at Harvard University Professor and student health care politics and "Court is ready to move some choice invalidate individual duty if the Democratic Congress and President should be".
Contributed by Kevin bag Atlanta reported.
0 comments:
Post a Comment