A complaint against Dr. James E. Mitchell is now before the Texas State Board of psychologists, claiming, develop professional codes of practice in promoting the c.i.a. injured "Advanced interrogation techniques" for use in its so-called black prison sites during the Bush administration war on terror. Together with Dr. Bruce Jessen, a fellow military psychologist, Dr. Mitchell was 11 c.i.a. interrogation methods, a primary developer of post Sept. currently under a criminal torture investigation by the Ministry of justice.
Dr. Mitchell, who has not responded to repeated requests for comment for this article, closed with company its experience in training soldiers as prisoners of war to a lucrative consulting with the CIA ÜberlebenEr orchestrated - and, according to the complaint involved - the harsh interrogation of terror suspect technique called waterboarding with sexual humiliation and the drowning.
Joseph Margulies, a Northwestern University law professor and Dicky Grigg, an Austin lawyer, worked with a Texas psychologists, Jim L. H. Cox, the complaint which documents in lurid detail Dr. Mitchell's role in the interrogation of prisoners to bring.
The complaint that launched in June, claims that the doctor put his qualifications, the CIA, "His own career and financial expectations about the safety of others" when designing a "Torture regime" misrepresented, with a "complete lack of scientific basis."
Mr. Margulies he pursued the possibility of a similar action against Dr. Jessen, who is licensed in Idaho said.
Mr. Margulies, said Dr. Mitchell never psychology in Texas had practiced although over the years he had maintained its license and it renewed.
The seriousness of the allegations led the American Psychological Association, the rare step of filing public comment in the Texas Licensing Board.The Group's letter said Dr. Mitchell were Member of professional association - he is not - and if the allegations were true, he would be expelled.
Of the Association ethics guidelines prohibit inhuman or abusive treatment of anyone, and it "no circumstances that are not so," including war or threat of terrorism Rhea Farberman, a spokeswoman said.
A spokeswoman for the Texas Board, said not could express, in the complaint and to say that the Board had disciplinary action against Dr. Mitchell, yet only one process to take, which takes about six months.
Mr. Margulies stressed the members of the Management Board importance in the process, called the "only gatekeeper" of the profession.
"" Are either up to the challenge or does is your responsibility,"he said.""It is a psychologist out there, which gives this Dinge.Es no credible question whether passiert.Es is again and again Bestätigt.Und so the question is whether it matters."
View the original article here
The answer? It is complicated. But, that's not stopping to explore some conservative members in nearly a dozen other States frantic about budget deficits and anticipate new costs from the federal health care overhaul of it.
"" States feel back against the wall, so this is the nuclear option for you, "said Christie Herrera, Director of health and human services task force for the American Exchange Legislative Council, an Association for conservative state legislatures.""I hear chatter of legislators around the country from States, under-the-radar taking this option."
In Texas, some Republicans - enhanced by its extended majority in the House of representatives - say, the strings, Medicaid and children's health insurance program (CHIP) connected some have estimated as high as $25 billion bankruptcy is State that a budget hole staring down. Argue, more effective and efficient care for children, disabled persons and the impoverished States could provide by either abandon federal money quite fitting or States grant exemptions always federal officials to provide health care, as you see fit.
Unemployed parents in Texas only qualify for Medicaid, if your income less than 12 percent of poverty ($22,050 for a family of four) and only to Katherine Cesinger, his spokeswoman working parents qualify if your income less than 26 percent of poverty said "The frustrations of the legislator understands how you are using a program deal 20% of the State budget, consumed" ist.Gouverneur Rick Perry. "Your options are strongly limited by a Federal Government that continue to tie your hands when it comes to managing Medicaid."
Opponents argue that deleting Medicaid would be so devastating effects on the economy of the State - not to currently within the mention of the health of the 3.6 million Texans enrolled-, that the idea is pure anti-Washington showmanship.
The Federal Government covers 60 percent of Texas' 45 billion dollar Medicaid biennial budget.Without money critics say, health care, the State could make would so limited that patients would undercovered emergency flood and Texans would end up paying the cost of local property control or higher insurance premiums.
"The real benefits of Medicaid is to take of a larger part it a common costs with the Feds, is" Regina Rogoff said executive Director of the safety net people's community clinic in Austin.
Speaking of a withdrawal from the program, Mrs Rogoff said: "this is local property control, increase, because patients avoid hospital emergency rooms cannot.""With the implication of us pay through federal taxes, subsidize care in other countries, so that people living in our country without care."
Fears notwithstanding, is the idea of dropping out of Medicaid on the table in Texas and a dozen other States, including Alabama, Mississippi, Washington and Wyoming.Optionen Medicaid include comprehensive flexibility States remaking with only State funding in use and costs looking for design and two federal exemptions change States parts their Medicaid programs, give.
"" If people in poverty superbad, that is one thing, ", said State representative Warren Chisum, Republican of the pampas, the State most vocal proponent of dropping out Medicaid and a candidate for speaker of the House."It breaks the heart, and half of the time staying drunk, me if someone smokes and we will provide your health care."
Starting in 2014, the new Health Act extends Medicaid to those with incomes up to 133 percent of poverty Federal $29,327 for a family of four in 2010 ist.Einige conservative think that if States Medicaid deleted many low-income people instead subsidies get Exchange into buying another piece of federal health care into force occurs. If in 2014 overhaul could become then fully responsible for Medicaid recipients who require nursing homes and other long-term care premiums and other Medicaid costs for Medicare beneficiaries - private insurance coverage by State but everyone else would go into the Exchange.
Edmund Haislmaier, senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative research organization estimates$ 46.5 billion in 2014 to 2019 under this model to save Texas würde.In of all Mr Haislmaier said, would come out ahead financially 40 States.
Others deny and note, millions of people from switch Medicaid of to subsidised private insurance costly would the Federal Government, and may be illegal.
"Subsidies explicitly not available are for those with incomes below the poverty line," said Jennifer Sullivan, senior health policy analyst at Families USA band.
This article was produced in partnership with Texas Tribune and Kaiser Health News (www.kaiserhealthnews.org), an editorially independent news service of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a non-partisan Health Organization that is not affiliated with KaiserPermanente.
eramshaw@texastribune.org
View the original article here
